Building with large language models used to mean picking one API and writing your own scaffolding. Now, it means something much more powerful, working with intelligent agents that collaborate, reason, and adapt. This is the core of a new generation of platforms: the multi agent LLM stack.

Dot and Flowise are both in this category. They help teams create and manage AI workflows. But when it comes to scale, orchestration, and enterprise readiness, the differences quickly show.

Let’s break down how they compare and why Dot may be the stronger foundation if you’re serious about building with multi agent LLM tools.

Visual Flow Meets Structured Architecture

Flowise is open-source and built around a visual, drag-and-drop interface. It lets you build custom LLM flows using agents, tools, and models. Developers can create chains for Q&A, summarization, or chat experiences by connecting nodes on a canvas.

Dot also supports visual creation, but its agent architecture is layered and role-based. Each agent in Dot is more than a node — it’s a decision-making unit with memory, reasoning, and tools. Instead of building long chains, you assign responsibilities. Agents coordinate under a Reasoning Layer that decides who does what, and when.

If your team wants to build scalable, explainable workflows with logic embedded in agents, Dot offers a deeper approach to multi agent LLM orchestration.

Try Dot now — free for 3 days.

Agent Roles and Reasoning Depth

Flowise supports both Chatflow (for single-agent LLMs) and Agentflow (for orchestration). You can connect multiple agents, give them basic tasks, and build workflows that mimic human-like coordination. But most decisions still live inside the flow itself like conditional routing or manual logic setup.

Dot was built from day one to support reasoning-first AI agents. System prompts define how agents behave. You don’t need long conditional logic chains  just assign the task, and the agent makes decisions using internal logic and shared memory.

This makes Dot a better choice for teams building real business processes where workflows grow, evolve, and require flexibility.

Multi Agent LLM Collaboration

Here’s where the difference becomes clearer: both tools support agents, but only Dot supports true multi agent LLM collaboration.

In Flowise, you build agent chains by linking actions. In Dot, agents talk to each other. A Router Agent might receive a query and delegate it to a Retrieval Agent and a Validator Agent. These agents interact through structured reasoning layers  like a team with a manager, not just blocks on a canvas.

This is especially useful for enterprise-grade workflows like:

• Loan approval pipelines
• Sales document automation
• IT ticket classification with exception handling

Dot treats AI agents like teammates, that means with memory, logic, and shared tools. Few multi agent LLM tools take collaboration this far.

Memory and Context Handling

Flowise lets you pass context through memory nodes. You can set up Redis, Pinecone, or other vector DBs to retrieve and store context. This works well but requires manual setup for each agent or node.

Dot automates this process. It uses session summarization by default and converting full chat histories into compact memory snippets. These summaries are then used in future sessions, saving tokens and keeping context sharp.

Coming soon, Dot will support long-term memory and cross-session retrieval across agents. That’s a major step forward for scalable multi agent LLM systems.

Deployment and Integration

Flowise can be deployed locally or in the cloud and integrates with tools like OpenAI, Claude, and even Hugging Face models. As an open-source platform, it gives full flexibility. It’s great for small teams or experimental use cases.

Dot supports cloud, on-premise, and hybrid deployments, each tailored for enterprise compliance needs. It also comes with pre-built integrations for Slack, Salesforce, Notion, and custom APIs. Dot is made for secure environments, with support for internal model hosting and multi-layer access control.

For enterprises, Dot’s integration and deployment options make it a safer, more scalable choice.

Feature Comparison Table

Developer Flexibility and Control

Flowise shines in flexibility. As an open-source project, it’s great for those who want to customize flows deeply. You can fork it, extend it, and self-host. Its community is active and helpful, especially for solo developers and small teams.

Dot is no-code by default but code when you want it. You can edit agent logic, prompt flows, and integrations directly. More importantly, developers don’t have to rewrite logic in every flow. With Dot, you define once, reuse everywhere, a big win for engineering speed and consistency.

If you’re evaluating serious orchestration tools beyond prototypes, check out our full Dot vs. CrewAI comparison to see how Dot handles complex agent collaboration compared to other popular frameworks.

Try Dot: Built for Enterprise AI Orchestration

Flowise is an impressive platform for building with LLMs visually, especially if you want full flexibility and are ready to manage the details.

But if your team needs smart agents that think, collaborate, and scale across departments, Dot brings structure to the chaos. With reasoning layers, built-in memory, and deep orchestration, Dot makes multi agent LLM systems practical in real enterprise settings.

Try Dot free for 3 days and see how quickly you can build real workflows, not just prototypes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Flowise suitable for enterprise-level multi agent LLM use cases?
Flowise works well for prototyping and visual agent flows, but it lacks the orchestration, memory, and compliance depth required by most enterprises managing complex multi agent LLM systems.

What makes Dot better than Flowise for developers?
Dot combines a code-optional interface with multi agent LLM architecture, long-term memory, and reasoning layers — giving developers more control without sacrificing usability.

Can Dot handle production workloads at scale?
Yes. Dot supports cloud, on-prem, and hybrid deployment with cost optimization strategies, secure model hosting, and modular workflows — ideal for scalable enterprise use.

‍

As artificial intelligence becomes part of everyday business, it’s easy to forget that not all AI agents are built the same. Behind every recommendation, prediction, or automated workflow, there's a distinct type of AI agent designed to handle a specific kind of task. Some are reactive. Others are proactive. Some work alone. Others coordinate with dozens of other agents at once.

Understanding the different types of AI agent helps you design smarter systems and delegate the right kind of work to the right intelligence. In this post, we’ll look at the core categories and explain how each one impacts your day-to-day operations.

Why Understanding the Types of AI Agent Matters

You don’t need to be a developer to benefit from understanding AI architecture. Whether you’re leading a marketing team, managing IT systems, or building customer support pipelines, the type of AI agent behind your tools influences:

• How flexible your workflows are
• How well agents collaborate with one another
• What level of decision-making is possible
• How much human oversight is required

The more you know about the types of AI agent, the better you can integrate them into your business.

The Five Main Types of AI Agent

Let’s break down the most common types of AI agent used in modern systems:

1. Simple Reflex Agents
   These agents act solely based on the current input. They follow predefined rules and do not consider the broader context. For example, a chatbot that gives fixed answers based on certain keywords is often powered by a reflex agent.
2. Model-Based Reflex Agents
   Unlike simple reflex agents, these have some memory. They maintain a model of the environment and adjust actions based on what they’ve previously observed. These agents are helpful for systems that require short-term learning, like real-time content moderation.
3. Goal-Based Agents
   These agents don’t just react, they aim for a specific outcome. They evaluate different actions and choose one that best meets their goal. Think of a recommendation engine trying to optimize for user engagement or a marketing agent targeting a lead conversion.
4. Utility-Based Agents
   A step beyond goal-based agents, these consider multiple outcomes and evaluate which one gives the most value. They balance trade-offs. An example would be a logistics AI that considers time, cost, and sustainability when routing deliveries.
5. Learning Agents
   These agents learn and evolve over time. They gather feedback from their environment and adjust their strategies. Most modern AI tools use learning agents in some capacity, especially those using machine learning.

Matching the Right Type of AI Agent to the Task

Choosing the right type of AI agent depends on the complexity of the task, the data available, and the level of autonomy needed. Here's how different tasks align with different agent types:

• Reactive tasks (e.g., filtering emails): Simple Reflex Agents
• Context-sensitive tasks (e.g., chatbot memory): Model-Based Reflex Agents
• Outcome-driven tasks (e.g., campaign optimization): Goal-Based Agents
• Multi-variable decisions (e.g., financial planning): Utility-Based Agents
• Continuous learning systems (e.g., fraud detection): Learning Agents

If you're working with multiple agents, you might also consider dynamic orchestration. Learn more about that in Meet Dynamic AI Agents: Fast, Adaptive, Scalable.

Benefits of Understanding the Types of AI Agent

Knowing which types of AI agent are running your systems gives you a strategic advantage. You can improve task delegation by assigning responsibilities to the right kind of agent, increase transparency when explaining decisions made by AI, and optimize performance by reducing unnecessary complexity. It also allows you to expand the number of use cases you can handle with confidence. Rather than treating AI as a black box, understanding agent types allows you to build systems that are easier to debug, scale, and improve.

How AI Agent Types Impact Workflows

Here’s what happens when the right type of AI agent is applied to the right part of the business:

1. Marketing: Goal-based agents prioritize the highest converting channels in real time.
2. Sales: Learning agents identify warm leads by observing historical patterns.
3. HR: Utility-based agents match candidates to open roles based on more than just keyword matching.
4. Operations: Reflex agents handle quick system alerts and route issues to relevant teams.
5. Product: Model-based agents adjust onboarding flows based on user behavior.

In each case, workflows become more intelligent, more adaptive, and less dependent on constant manual adjustments.

Combining Multiple Types of AI Agent

You don’t have to choose one type of AI agent per system. In fact, the best platforms combine multiple agents:

• A customer support flow might begin with a reflex agent, escalate to a goal-based agent, and then flag unresolved cases to a learning agent for analysis.
• A financial tool might combine utility-based agents for risk analysis and model-based agents for historical forecasting.

The orchestration of these agents allows for sophisticated multi-step workflows. You can start with one agent and evolve to networks of specialized agents over time.

Signs You’re Using the Wrong Type of AI Agent

Sometimes workflows suffer not because AI is missing, but because the wrong type of AI agent is in play. Signs include:

• Frequent errors due to lack of context awareness
• Inability to adapt when the environment changes
• Overly rigid behaviors that frustrate users
• Lack of explanation for decision-making

If you're seeing these issues, it may be time to audit which types of AI agent are behind each tool and switch to a better fit.

Conclusion: Don’t Just Use AI Know What’s Powering It

The world of AI is rapidly expanding, and so is the number of intelligent agents operating behind the scenes. Understanding the types of AI agent that power your tools helps you deploy them with purpose, monitor their performance, and scale them with confidence.

Whether you're just beginning your journey or managing complex multi-agent systems, knowing which type of AI agent is running your workflow is a small shift that leads to better design, better results, and better trust.

‍Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use multiple types of AI agent in one product?
Yes. Many systems use reflex agents for basic tasks and learning agents for improvement over time.

Do I need to know how to code to choose the right AI agent?
No. Most modern platforms let you choose agents based on workflows, not programming.

Which type of AI agent is best for long-term scalability?
Learning agents are typically best for adapting to change, but a mix of types offers more flexibility.

‍

Artificial intelligence is no longer confined to static models that perform single tasks in predictable ways. The new generation of tools — dynamic AI agents — brings flexibility, context awareness, and speed into real-world business workflows. Whether they’re used to manage internal operations, assist with customer queries, or optimize logistics, dynamic AI agents are built to respond, learn, and evolve.

In this blog, we’ll unpack what dynamic AI agents really are, why they matter, and how they’re transforming industries. You may already be using them, or you might be considering how to integrate them. Either way, understanding their design and impact is essential for building scalable, intelligent systems.

What Are Dynamic AI Agents?

Dynamic AI agents are autonomous systems that can perceive, decide, and act in real time while adapting to their environment. Unlike rule-based bots or static automation tools, dynamic AI agents can:

• Switch goals based on changing input
• Learn from new data and past performance
• Interact with other agents or humans
• Reconfigure themselves in multi-agent settings

This makes them particularly effective in environments where context is constantly shifting such as customer support, operations, marketing, and data analysis.

How Dynamic AI Agents Work

Dynamic AI agents rely on three foundational components:

1. Perception Layer: Ingests data from various sources (text, audio, APIs, logs).
2. Decision Engine: Uses AI models to evaluate the situation, weigh priorities, and plan actions.
3. Action Layer: Executes outputs, whether it’s an email draft, a CRM update, or a data summary.

Many of today’s dynamic AI agents are also multi-modal, meaning they can process input from various data types simultaneously. This makes them highly adaptable for use cases like:

• Generating reports based on spreadsheet and email context
• Coordinating tasks with other AI agents
• Updating workflows based on real-time team inputs

Use Cases Across Industries

Dynamic AI agents are not tied to a single domain. Their flexibility makes them ideal across sectors:

• Customer Service: Handle inquiries, escalate complex tickets, and learn from each interaction.
• Sales: Automate prospect outreach, lead scoring, and pipeline tracking.
• Finance: Summarize transactions, detect anomalies, and forecast revenue.
• Healthcare: Assist in patient intake, triage support, and data aggregation.
• Logistics: Track inventory, optimize routes, and update orders in real time.

In every case, dynamic AI agents take over the repetitive, structured parts of the job, freeing human teams for strategy, creativity, and relationship-building.

Why Teams Are Choosing Dynamic AI Agents

The rise of dynamic AI agents is not just about automation, it’s about creating responsive systems that collaborate intelligently. Teams are adopting them because:

• They scale with growing workloads
• They handle multi-step tasks without hand-holding
• They provide insights, not just outputs
• They integrate with tools already in place
• They adapt when priorities change

For companies juggling cross-functional demands, dynamic AI agents offer a way to maintain clarity without micromanagement.

Building a System With Dynamic AI Agents

To integrate dynamic AI agents successfully, companies should follow a clear path:

1. Identify Repeatable Workflows: Choose processes where AI can add immediate value.
2. Define Goals and Boundaries: Make sure the agent knows when to act and when to escalate.
3. Provide Contextual Data: Connect the agent to reliable sources CRMs, ERPs, calendars.
4. Set Up Collaboration: Allow your dynamic AI agents to work alongside teammates and other agents.
5. Test and Iterate: Monitor the agent’s outputs and refine the instructions, tools, or goals as needed.

You can read more about AI agent design patterns and types in Types of AI Agents: Which One Is Running Your Workflow?.

Benefits of Dynamic AI Agents

Let’s break down the specific benefits that come with adopting dynamic AI agents:

• Speed: They react in real time and reduce turnaround from hours to seconds.
• Consistency: Fewer mistakes, more structured responses.
• Scalability: Handle thousands of queries or tasks without adding headcount.
• Adaptability: Pivot based on new rules, data, or situations.
• Cost-Efficiency: Save operational expenses by automating knowledge work.

These benefits compound over time, especially when dynamic AI agents are integrated into core business systems.

Common Misconceptions

Despite their value, dynamic AI agents are often misunderstood. They are not chatbots, even if they use chat as an interface, their backend intelligence is much more robust. They also don’t need constant retraining, since most agents can learn incrementally and adapt using feedback loops. Furthermore, they’re not black boxes. Modern tools allow teams to review decision paths and adjust behaviors easily. Understanding these differences helps organizations build trust and rely more confidently on dynamic AI agents for mission-critical work.

Real Results From Dynamic AI Agents

Businesses using dynamic AI agents report measurable gains:

1. A fintech company reduced onboarding time by 60% by deploying agents that collect and validate documents.
2. A retail firm improved product content quality using agents that rewrite descriptions and analyze buyer trends.
3. A healthcare provider used AI agents to triage patient messages, cutting administrative time in half.

These results show that when designed and deployed thoughtfully, dynamic AI agents generate immediate ROI.

Conclusion: The Future Is Teamwork Between Agents and Humans

Dynamic AI agents are not just faster tools, they are smarter collaborators. As the technology matures, more teams will lean on these agents to handle complexity, scale intelligently, and adapt as fast as the world changes.

Your next hire might not be a person. It might be a dynamic agent designed to support your existing team.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes dynamic AI agents different from static automation tools?
Dynamic AI agents learn, adapt, and respond to context, unlike fixed scripts or rule-based bots.

Can I use multiple dynamic AI agents together?
Yes. In fact, they often work best in networks, sharing tasks and data with one another.

Are dynamic AI agents secure for enterprise use?
Yes, especially when deployed with proper governance, access controls, and audit trails.

‍

AI models are only as good as the prompts they receive. Even the most powerful tools can give vague, unhelpful, or off-target responses if they’re guided poorly. That’s where the science and art of prompt engineering comes in.

This blog explores prompt engineering basics and how they affect the output you get from AI systems. Whether you're writing for a chatbot, content generator, or data assistant, your ability to craft clear prompts can make the difference between success and frustration.

Why Prompt Engineering Basics Matter

Prompt engineering basics are the foundation of any effective AI interaction. By understanding how to structure inputs, set expectations, and add context, you:

• Get more accurate and relevant outputs
• Save time on back-and-forth corrections
• Unlock new capabilities within existing tools
• Avoid hallucinations or broken logic in responses

For teams relying on AI for real work, marketing, operations, customer support, or product, mastering prompt engineering basics pays off quickly.

What Makes a Good AI Prompt

Not all prompts are created equal. Some make the AI guess what you want. Others guide the system clearly and efficiently. Here’s what makes a good prompt work:

• Clarity: Use simple, direct language
• Specificity: Provide details on length, tone, format, or examples
• Context: Add background that helps the AI understand your intent
• Structure: Break down complex asks into smaller parts

For example:

Weak prompt: Write a post

Strong prompt: Write a 100-word LinkedIn post in a friendly tone explaining how developers can benefit from prompt engineering basics

Prompt Engineering Basics in Action

Let’s say your team wants to generate FAQs for a new feature launch. Using prompt engineering basics, your flow might look like this:

1. "The product is a mobile app that helps users track carbon emissions. Write 5 FAQ questions and answers about the feature that allows photo-based tracking."
2. Review the AI response. If too vague, follow up: "Make the tone more informative and expand each answer to 3 sentences."
3. Use a new prompt: "Now write a summary paragraph that can go at the top of the FAQ section."

This approach guides the AI in manageable steps, with clear adjustments that align with your goal.

Common Mistakes in Prompt Engineering

Even experienced users fall into traps. Here are a few to avoid:

• Too open-ended: Without limits, the AI fills in gaps in ways you might not want.
• Overloading: Asking for too many things in one prompt leads to confusion.
• Ignoring format: If you want a bulleted list, say it. Otherwise, you may get a paragraph.
• Skipping feedback: Great prompts are often built iteratively.

Prompt engineering basics help you prevent these issues before they affect your output quality.

Prompt Engineering for Different Use Cases

Prompt engineering basics apply differently depending on what you’re working on. Here are just a few examples:

• Marketing: Guide the AI to adopt brand voice, generate CTAs, and follow content formats.
• Customer Support: Use prompts to classify tickets, summarize complaints, and draft replies.
• Data Analysis: Ask for summaries, visualizations, or predictions based on specific inputs.
• HR: Create prompts for screening answers, writing job descriptions, or coaching responses.

Each of these areas benefits from tailored prompt structures. Understanding the context and expected format is crucial.

Prompt Engineering in Collaborative Workflows

Teams often work together to build AI interactions. Prompt engineering basics support collaboration by reducing duplication with shared prompt libraries, standardizing tone and output through templates, and improving accuracy via team feedback loops. If you’re using tools that allow multi-agent setups or layered workflows, prompt design becomes even more important. You can read more about scalable agent structures in What If One AI Platform Could Do It All.

Tips to Improve Your Prompts Fast

Here are a few quick ways to upgrade your AI interactions:

• Ask for multiple versions: "Give me three variations of this."
• Combine tone and function: "Write a professional yet casual welcome email."
• Add negative instructions: "Avoid buzzwords like innovative or cutting-edge."
• Use placeholders: "Write a social media caption for {product name} launching on {date}."

These small improvements can have a big impact on the usefulness of AI-generated content.

Prompt Engineering Basics for Beginners

If you’re just getting started, here’s a checklist to follow:

• Know your output goal before you start
• Be specific in what you ask for
• Include details about tone, audience, or format
• Break large tasks into sequential prompts
• Always review and refine the output

Mastering prompt engineering basics means thinking like a guide, not just a user. You’re shaping the interaction.

Advanced Prompt Engineering Techniques

For more complex needs, prompt engineering basics scale into deeper strategies:

1. Chain-of-thought prompting: Ask the AI to reason step by step before giving the final answer
2. Role-based prompting: Set a persona (e.g., "Act as a legal expert…") to shape responses
3. Zero-shot vs few-shot: Provide examples when needed or test how the model handles things without them
4. Multi-step prompts: Use structured sequences to guide the model through a workflow

These techniques can boost the performance of AI agents in planning, decision-making, and creative generation.

Prompt Engineering in Multi-Agent Systems

When using multiple agents that interact with one another, prompt clarity becomes even more critical. Each agent might take on a specific role editor, researcher, planner and needs carefully written inputs.

By embedding prompt engineering basics in each step of your agent workflow, you:

• Improve overall system reliability
• Reduce noise and miscommunication between agents
• Keep outputs aligned with project goals

This is especially useful in enterprise systems where layered automation is common.

Conclusion: You’re Talking to an AI, Make It Count

Prompt engineering basics help you get the most out of today’s powerful AI tools. They also help ensure consistency, accuracy, and usability across workflows. Whether you're writing one-off prompts or designing a full AI workflow, what you say and how you say it matters. Keep practicing, keep refining, and watch how even small changes in wording lead to significantly better results.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can prompt engineering basics improve AI accuracy?
Yes. Clear, structured prompts reduce ambiguity and make AI outputs more reliable.

Is prompt engineering only for developers?
No. Anyone using AI tools can benefit, from marketers to product managers and beyond.

What if I want multiple outputs from one prompt?
You can ask the AI to generate several versions in one go. Just say: “Give me five options.”

‍

TL;DR

Shipping a great LLM-powered product has less to do with writing a clever one-line prompt and much more to do with curating the whole block of tokens the model receives. The craft, call it context engineering, means deciding what to include (task hints, in-domain examples, freshly retrieved facts, tool output, compressed history) and what to leave out, so that answers stay accurate, fast, and affordable. Below is a practical tour of the ideas, techniques, and tooling that make this possible, written in a conversational style you can drop straight into a tech blog.

Prompt Engineering Is Only The Surface

When you chat with an LLM, a “prompt” feels like a single instruction: “Summarise this article in three bullet points.” In production, that prompt sits inside a much larger context window that may also carry:

1. A short rationale explaining why the task matters to the business
2. A handful of well-chosen examples that show the expected format
3. Passages fetched on the fly from a knowledge base (the Retrieval-Augmented Generation pattern)
4. Outputs from previous tool calls, think database rows, CSV snippets, or code blocks
5. A running memory of earlier turns, collapsed into a tight summary to stay under the token limit

Get the balance wrong and quality suffers in surprising ways: leave out a key fact and the model hallucinates; stuff in too much noise and both latency and invoice spike.

Own The Window: Pack It Yourself

A simple way to tighten output is to abandon multi-message chat schemas and speak to the model in a single, dense block, YAML, JSON, or plain text with clear section markers. That gives you:

1. Higher information density. Tokens you save on boilerplate can carry domain facts instead.
2. Deterministic parsing. The model sees explicit field names, easier to extract structured answers.
3. Safer handling of sensitive data. You can redact or mask at the very edge before anything hits the API.
4. Rapid A/B testing. With one block, swapping a field or reordering sections is trivial.

Techniques That Pay For Themselves

Window packing

If your app handles many short requests, concatenate them into one long prompt and let a small routing layer split the responses. Benchmarks from hardware vendors show throughput gains of up to sixfold when you do this.

Chunk-size tuning for RAG

Longer retrieved passages give coherence; shorter ones improve recall. Treat passage length as a hyper-parameter and test it like you would batch size or learning rate.

Hierarchical summarization

Every few turns, collapse the running chat history into “meeting minutes.” Keep those minutes in context instead of the verbatim exchange. You preserve memory without paying full price in tokens.

‍Structured tags

Embed intent flags or record IDs right inside the prompt. The model no longer has to guess which part of the text is a SQL query or an error log, it’s labeled.

‍Prompt-size heuristics

General rules of thumb:

1. Defer expensive retrieval until you’re sure you need it
2. Squeeze boilerplate into variables
3. Compress long numeric or ID lists with range notation {1-100}.

Why A Wrapper Isn’t Enough

A real LLM application is an orchestration layer full of moving parts:

All of these components manipulate or depend on the context window, so treating it as a first-class resource pays dividends across the stack.

Cost, Latency, And The Token Ledger

API pricing is linear in input + output tokens. Reclaiming 10 % of the prompt often yields a direct 10% saving. Window packing, caching repeated RAG hits, and speculative decoding each claw back more margin or headroom for new features.

Quality And Safety On A Loop

It’s no longer enough to run an offline eval once a quarter. Modern teams wire up automatic A/B runs every day: tweak the context format, push to staging, score on a standing test set, and roll forward or back depending on the graph. Meanwhile, guardrails stream-scan responses so a risky completion can be cut mid-sentence rather than flagged after the fact.

From Prompt Engineer To Context Engineer

The short boom in “prompt engineering” job ads is already giving way to roles that sound more familiar, LLM platform engineer, AI infra engineer, conversational AI architect. These people design retrieval pipelines, optimise token economics, add observability hooks, and yes, still tweak prompts, but as one part of a broader context-engineering toolkit.

Key Takeaways

1. Think in windows. The model only sees what fits; choose wisely.
2. Custom, single-block prompts beat verbose chat schemas on density, cost, and safety.
3. Context engineering links directly to routing choices, guardrails, and eval dashboards.
4. Tooling is catching up fast; human judgment still separates a usable product from a demo.
5. Career growth now lies in orchestrating the whole pipeline, not just word-smithing instructions.

Further reading

• Graphcore white-paper, PackedBERT: Accelerating Transformers with Packing (2023)
• Konrad Staniszewski et al., Structured Packing for Long Context (arXiv, 2023)
• Q. Zhang et al., SmartSpec: Optimising Speculative Decoding (arXiv, 2024)
• Google Cloud, Prompt-Size Optimisation Field Guide (2025)
• NVIDIA, NeMo Guardrails Documentation
• Andrej Karpathy, tweet on “context engineering”
• The rise of "context engineering", Langchain blog

‍

We are proud to have organized the second edition of our community event: "Novus Meetups: Startup 101."

At Novus, we've always believed that sharing experiences is just as important as developing technology which is why these meetups mean so much to us. They create space not only to learn but also to connect.

‍

‍

This event brought together early-stage founders, aspiring entrepreneurs, university students, and anyone curious about what it really takes to build something from scratch. The energy in the room was honest, full of stories, questions, and the kind of community exchange that reminds us why we do what we do.

A big thank you to Yapay Zeka Fabrikası and Workup İş Bankası for supporting this event and helping make it happen!

At our event, our Co-Founders Rıza Egehan Asad and Vorga Can shared the founding story of Novus, from how they first met to the early pivots that shaped the company. More importantly, they opened the floor to participants, answering questions directly. We have to say, this part was especially meaningful, there’s nothing quite like having one-on-one conversations with attendees. It’s moments like these that make the whole experience so rewarding for us.

As always, we wrapped things up with what we love most: networking over coffee.

Thank you to everyone who joined us, you made this day truly meaningful.

‍

‍

We're now taking a short summer break from our meetups, but we’ll be back soon with new topics and exciting guests.

Follow us on Luma to stay informed about our next meetup!

You can also stay connected via LinkedIn, Instagram, X, or our newsletter!

‍

‍

Hey there,

Duru here from Novus with your monthly dose of AI insights. June brought a mix of big moves and strange twists, from copyright lawsuits and secretive model training to AI-powered toys and virtual influencers that feel a little too real.

Whether you're building with AI, thinking about where it's headed, or just trying to keep up, I’ve gathered the key stories from this month in one place for you.

Let’s dive in.

June 2025 AI News Highlights

Did DeepSeek Secretly Use Gemini to Train Its Model?

Observers noticed near-identical outputs between DeepSeek’s new model and Google’s Gemini, sparking suspicions that Gemini was used in training.

DeepSeek denied the allegations. Google hasn’t responded.

Key Point: A case that may redefine how AI training ethics and model transparency are handled — especially between global competitors.

🔗 Further Reading

Real People, Fake AI? TikTokers Pretend to Be Veo 3 Creations

TikTokers are acting like AI-generated videos to confuse viewers — and it’s working. They mimic the signature look of Google’s Veo 3 to go viral.

The result? Humans pretending to be AI while viewers can’t tell the difference.

Key Point: The realism of AI video has hit a new milestone, now it’s humans trying to pass as machines for attention.

🔗 Further Reading

Barbie Gets an AI Upgrade

Mattel is working with OpenAI to launch an AI-powered Barbie that can chat with kids and react intelligently to their actions.

It’s part of a broader plan to bring AI across all Mattel toys from playtime to smart-time.

Key Point: Barbie is getting brains. OpenAI tech will turn classic toys into interactive companions for the next generation.

🔗 Further Reading

Disney and Universal Sue Midjourney Over Copyright Infringement

Disney and Universal allege Midjourney used copyrighted images from their franchises to train its AI, violating IP rights.

This lawsuit could set a huge precedent for how generative AI is allowed to learn.

Key Point: This case could shape the legal future of how generative AI tools train and what they can use.

🔗 Further Reading

Novus Updates: From Paris Stages to Türkiye’s Tech Future

Novus in Spotlight

The past few weeks have been filled with exciting milestones for Novus, from international stages to building deeper roots in Türkiye’s tech ecosystem.

• At AI Summit 2025 in Cyprus, our Head of AI Halit Orenbaş spoke at Eastern Mediterranean University about how AI agents are used in real-world decision-making. It was a valuable conversation on the future of orchestration.
• Watch the full talk here: link
• Dot featured on CNBC-e. Our CEO Rıza Egehan Asad joined 0’dan 1’e to talk about Novus, Dot, and how multi-agent systems are reshaping enterprise AI.
• At VivaTech 2025 in Paris, our co-founders Vorga and Egehan connected with global leaders and returned with new ideas and energy to take Dot further.
• We hosted our second Novus Meetups, bringing together students, early-stage founders, and startup-curious professionals for real conversations about what it takes to build something from scratch.
• See upcoming events here: lu.ma/novusmeetups

Educational Insights from Duru’s AI Learning Journey

Each month, I share articles that help me think more critically about AI systems, not just what they do, but how they’re designed to shape our behavior and culture. These two stories from June dig into why chatbots never let go, and what happens when influencers are no longer human.

Why Do AI Chatbots Never Let You Go?

Ever try to leave a chatbot conversation and somehow end up chatting for 20 minutes more? That’s not a bug — it’s the point. From ChatGPT to Claude, most AI chatbots are designed to maximize engagement. They’re friendly, agreeable, and always ready with another answer. But behind that charm lies a monetization strategy.

Trained to please, these bots can fall into “sycophancy” — agreeing with you even when it’s wrong. That’s risky, especially in sensitive domains like mental health or legal advice. The friendlier they get, the harder it becomes to tell whether you're in a real conversation or just stuck in a design loop.

Key Point: AI chatbots are optimized to keep users engaged — sometimes at the cost of truth, accuracy, and even well-being.

🔗 Further Reading

Why AI‑Generated Accounts Could Change Influencer Culture

In less than a week, TikTok’s @impossibleais racked up 150,000 followers using only 12 AI-generated ASMR videos. But this isn’t just another viral moment — it’s a sign of what’s next for online influence. AI creators offer brands scalable, cost-effective alternatives to human influencers. And platforms like TikTok are leaning into it with tools like the Symphony ad suite.

What stands out is how well AI content performs. With glowing visuals, precise cuts, and satisfying sounds, AI videos are now engineered to tap directly into what makes content go viral. And as audiences grow more comfortable with digital personalities, questions about transparency and ethics are only getting louder.

Key Point: AI influencers are quickly gaining traction and offering new efficiencies for brands and raising new questions for audiences.

🔗 Further Reading

Until Next Time

Thanks for reading this month’s round-up. If you’re enjoying these insights, the conversation doesn’t stop here.

Subscribe to our bi-weekly newsletter to stay sharp on what’s shaping the future of AI — from major headlines to Novus updates and team reflections.

And if you prefer something more fun than newsletters, check out our podcast Açık Kaynak on YouTube. Honest, unscripted, and packed with the kind of AI takes you won’t hear anywhere else.

Choosing an AI tool is not just a matter of convenience. It shapes how a company handles tasks, workflows, and long-term growth. Many teams explore CrewAI because it is a well-known open source framework for multi agent ai systems, offering flexibility for developers.

However, enterprises that need more than a DIY solution often look for deeper functionality and support.

Dot is designed for teams that want to move beyond assembling basic AI agents on their own. With advanced agent orchestration, full data control, and robust integrations, Dot gives businesses a platform that grows with their needs.

This post compares Dot and CrewAI side by side to help operations teams and enterprise developers find the best fit for their goals among modern multi agent ai systems.

Model Options: One Path or Multiple Choices

Flexibility in model choice can make the difference between a good AI experience and an outstanding one.

• CrewAI: Built as a model-agnostic platform, CrewAI lets you plug in any large language model (LLM) of your choice. Whether you prefer OpenAI’s GPT series or other models, CrewAI supports it. In fact, you can “use any LLM or cloud provider” with CrewAI. This freedom is powerful, but it relies on you bringing and managing those model APIs.
• Dot: Dot allows businesses to choose from multiple AI models out-of-the-box. It supports OpenAI’s models and also includes Cohere, Anthropic, Mistral, Gemini, and more. Dot can even intelligently select the best model for a given task, let you pick one based on your needs or bring your own LLMs.

Having multiple model options means teams can fine-tune cost and performance for each project. When comparing multi agent ai systems, model flexibility is no longer a nice-to-have – it’s a must-have.

Data Control: Managing Your Own Information

Data security and control are top priorities for businesses handling sensitive information.

• CrewAI: Because CrewAI is open source and on-premises capable, companies can deploy it within their own infrastructure for full control and compliance. This allows sensitive data to stay in-house.
• Dot: Dot offers full data control by letting businesses choose between cloud hosting, on-premise deployment, or a hybrid setup. In industries that require strict compliance or data residency, Dot provides the flexibility to keep all sensitive information on your own servers, meeting regulatory standards or internal policies with ease.

Both Dot and CrewAI recognize that enterprises need this level of control in their multi agent ai systems. Allowing self-hosting or private cloud deployment ensures that businesses maintain ownership of their data. Both platforms recognize this need, but Dot’s approach makes enterprise data management especially straightforward and customizable.

Functionality: More Than Basic Automation

For real business needs, multi agent ai systems must do more than chat, they should orchestrate complex workflows and actively assist your team.

• CrewAI: CrewAI functions as a framework for building automated agents and workflows. It enables developers to create “crews” of AI agents that can collaborate on tasks. You start by defining custom agents with specific roles and goals. Essentially, CrewAI gives you the building blocks to assemble multi-step automations using code or its studio. This provides a lot of power, but achieving a full solution might require significant setup and technical effort.
• Dot: Dot operates as a complete AI platform where multiple AI agents can collaborate, handle tasks, and automate full workflows right out of the box. With Dot’s library of over 100 pre-built agents for common business processes, you can orchestrate complete workflows with minimal setup – agents automatically pull data, analyze results, and complete tasks in sequence.

Both Dot and CrewAI enable multi-agent automation, but Dot’s platform approach means your team spends less time building basic functionality and more time leveraging AI to get results.

If you want to learn more about enterprise level multi-agent AI platforms, check out our blog post “Dot vs Sana AI: What Businesses Really Need from AI for Enterprise” for more comparisons.

Customization: Tailor AI to Your Needs

Customization determines how well an AI platform fits your workflows. This is especially true for multi agent ai systems, which often need to adapt to complex processes and diverse team requirements.

• CrewAI: As an open-source platform, CrewAI allows developers to modify its codebase for deep customization. However, because most modifications require coding, non-technical team members will likely need developer support to make significant changes.
• Dot: Dot provides a no-code environment where teams can visually build and adjust AI workflows without writing code. Non-technical users can configure and chain AI agents easily, while developers have the option to fine-tune agents under the hood and integrate Dot with internal systems.

In this way, Dot serves as both an easy-to-use platform and a flexible framework for multi agent ai systems that technical teams can extend without starting from scratch. This dual approach makes Dot highly adaptable to both business users and developers alike.

Integrations: Connecting with the Tools You Already Use

A great AI platform connects with the tools your business relies on every day. Integrations are therefore a key factor when evaluating multi agent ai systems.

• CrewAI: In practice, this means you can connect CrewAI agents to many popular apps (via connectors or APIs) to automate actions like sending emails or creating tickets. This breadth of options is powerful, though some integrations may require extra configuration or coding.
• Dot: Dot includes native integrations with major enterprise platforms such as Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Zendesk, and many others. These built-in integrations make it simple to plug Dot into your existing tech stack without custom development. For example, a Dot agent can automatically post an update to Slack or create a new entry in your CRM as part of a workflow.

CrewAI’s 1,200+ app integrations are impressive for breadth, but Dot focuses on deep, ready-made connections that enterprises can deploy instantly for real productivity gains.

Pricing: What Are You Really Paying For?

When comparing enterprise multi agent ai systems, cost isn’t just about a subscription fee – it’s about the value each platform provides.

• CrewAI: The core CrewAI platform is open source and free to use. However, for managed cloud services and enterprise support, CrewAI offers custom pricing (businesses need to contact their team for a quote). In short, you can experiment with CrewAI for free, but large-scale production deployments will involve paid plans for hosting, support, and advanced features.
• Dot: Dot offers a transparent, scalable pricing model. You can start with a 3 day free trial (including basic model access and agents) and then upgrade on a pay-as-you-go basis as your usage grows. Higher tiers unlock multi-model access, dedicated enterprise support, on-premise deployment options, and more. This flexible approach ensures you only pay for what you need, when you need it.

Quick Overview: Dot vs. CrewAI

‍

Conclusion: Why Dot Is Built for Business Success

While CrewAI provides one of the more flexible, developer-focused options among multi agent ai systems, enterprises often need more. They require flexibility, control, deep integrations, and real workflow automation across the organization.

Dot is designed from the ground up to meet these needs. It gives businesses the power to:

• Work across multiple AI models
• Maintain full control over data and deployments
• Build no-code or custom-coded workflows
• Integrate easily with existing tools and systems
• Scale efficiently with flexible pricing

If your goal is to deploy the best AI platform for your team – one that helps you work smarter and grow faster – Dot stands out as the platform of choice among multi agent ai systems.

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes Dot better for enterprises than CrewAI?
Dot offers built-in AI models, no-code workflows, native integrations, and flexible deployment, so teams can scale faster with less setup.

Does Dot require coding to set up workflows?

No. Dot lets you build and adjust workflows visually, while still allowing code-level customization if needed.

Is Dot more expensive than CrewAI?
Not always. CrewAI’s core is free, but production use often needs paid hosting and support. Dot’s pricing is clear and scalable.

‍

‍

Imagine typing a few words and watching them transform into a vibrant music video in seconds. No camera. No editing software. Just AI turning your ideas into visuals that move with the beat. This is no longer science fiction. It is what today’s AI music video generator technology makes possible.

These tools are changing the way artists, marketers, and content creators bring music to life. Let’s break down how they work, what powers them, and why they are gaining attention.

What Is an AI Music Video Generator?

An AI music video generator is a system that creates video content based on inputs like text prompts, audio files, or style references. It analyzes your direction and generates visuals that align with the music’s mood, rhythm, and energy.

At its core, this type of tool combines several AI technologies:

• Text-to-video generation to create scenes from descriptions
• Audio analysis that detects tempo, mood, and structure
• Motion alignment to synchronize visuals with the beat
• Generative image models that craft unique frames

Unlike traditional video editing, it removes the need for manual sequencing or heavy post-production work. The AI handles the assembly and synchronization.

How the Technology Works

A modern AI music video generator operates using multimodal AI. This means it processes and combines multiple types of input (text, audio, and sometimes image references) into one output. Here is a simplified look at the flow:

1. The AI processes the text prompt and generates a visual storyboard.
2. It analyzes the music file to understand tempo, key transitions, and emotional tone.
3. Scenes are created and animated in sync with the beat and mood.
4. The system applies styles or effects that match user preferences or genre.

These systems rely on massive training datasets of video, audio, and text to learn what works. The better the training data, the more realistic and cohesive the final output from an AI music video generator will be.

This process is becoming more advanced as AI models evolve. If you are curious about how these multimodal systems are reshaping creative industries, check out our blog on ''How Multimodal Used in Generative AI Is Changing Content Creation''.

Examples of Leading AI Music Video Generators

Several platforms and models are pushing the boundaries of this technology:

• Google’s Veo: A cutting-edge text-to-video model designed for high-quality, cinematic video generation. Veo produces realistic camera movements, detailed environments, and consistent style across frames. You can read more about its capabilities in Google’s official announcement.
• Runway Gen-2: Known for its ability to generate short video clips from text prompts, Runway’s system allows creators to blend styles, add motion, and produce looping music visuals with ease.
• Pika Labs: Pika focuses on accessible, easy-to-use video generation tools that help users craft AI-powered music videos by entering simple prompts combined with audio uploads.

Each AI music video generator has its strengths, but all are working toward making music video creation faster and more inclusive.

Key Features to Look For

Choosing the right AI music video generator means knowing what really matters for your goals. Not every tool offers the same level of creative control, quality, or ease of use.

Essential Features

• Ability to interpret detailed text prompts
• Music rhythm and mood detection
• Scene transitions that match audio structure
• High-resolution video output

Bonus Features

• Style presets for specific music genres
• Editable outputs for further customization
• Export options for different platforms

These features help ensure that the generated videos are not just experimental, but ready for practical use.

Popular Use Cases for AI Music Video Generators

The demand for AI music video generator tools is growing across different fields. Here are some common applications:

1. Independent Musicians
   Artists use AI to create affordable and unique music videos without hiring a full production team.
2. Content Creators
   Social media influencers generate quick, eye-catching clips that match trending audio.
3. Marketing Teams
   Brands develop dynamic campaign assets that align with theme music or jingles.
4. Educators and Researchers
   These tools support experiments in audiovisual storytelling and learning.

The ability to produce professional-quality content with minimal resources makes an AI music video generator a valuable tool for creators at all levels.

Opportunities and Challenges

While the progress is exciting, today’s AI music video generator tools are not without challenges:

• Videos may still need human editing for polish or creative adjustments.
• Fine-grained control over visuals can be limited compared to manual editing tools.
• Generating high-quality results often requires significant processing power.

There is also an ongoing conversation about copyright and ownership, especially when AI-generated visuals resemble existing artistic styles. Creators will need to balance automation with originality to stand out.

However, models like Veo and Runway are closing these gaps quickly, offering increasingly polished outputs with more user control.

Where This Technology Is Headed

The future of AI music video generator tools looks bright. In the coming years, we can expect:

• Real-time video generation for live music performances
• Even greater creative control over camera angles, effects, and transitions
• Deeper integration with music production software
• Support for more languages, cultures, and artistic styles

We will also likely see more collaborative AI tools, where creators can guide and edit videos interactively as they are being generated. As accessibility improves, these generators could become as common as video editing apps are today.

As these tools advance, they will further democratize video production, allowing more people to tell their stories visually.

Conclusion: A New Canvas for Music Creators

An AI music video generator is more than just a tool for automation. It represents a new way for musicians, brands, and creators to visualize sound. What once took weeks of work and large budgets can now begin with a prompt and a track.

As models like Google Veo, Runway, and Pika continue to improve, the gap between idea and finished product gets smaller. Whether you are an indie artist or part of a creative agency, this technology opens new possibilities for expression.

For anyone who has imagined turning music into moving pictures, now is the time to experiment with an AI music video generator and see where it can take your vision.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do AI music video generators work with any type of music?
Yes. Most systems can process any audio file, although results may vary based on how well the AI matches the mood and rhythm.

Is technical knowledge required to use AI music video generator tools?
No. Most platforms are designed for non-technical users and require only prompts and audio files.

Are AI-generated music videos ready for commercial release?
Some are, particularly when using advanced tools like Google Veo, but most benefit from light human editing before publishing.

‍